Introduction
This article is based on a powerful and revealing interview with Jeffrey David Sachs, an acclaimed American economist and public policy analyst, currently a professor at Columbia University. Known for his fearless commentary and clear-eyed analysis, Sachs sat down with a podcaster to unpack the harsh realities of the Israel-Palestine conflict, U.S. foreign policy, and the growing global backlash against Israel’s actions. In a world saturated with media spin and political noise, Sachs brings a rare blend of honesty, historical perspective, and moral clarity — and his words demand attention. This article attempts to breakdown how Israel’s rigid policies are leading to global isolation.
Jeffrey Sachs – A Rational Voice in Chaos
Jeffrey Sachs has earned a reputation for speaking truth to power. In this interview, he challenges widely accepted narratives around the Israel-Palestine conflict and the role of the United States in enabling it. His critique is rooted in decades of global policy analysis and a commitment to human rights.
Israel’s Refusal to Compromise
Under the leadership of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel has taken an uncompromising stance on the issue of Palestine. The current government has stated clearly that it intends to maintain control over Palestinian territories indefinitely, rejecting any two-state solution.
What “No Compromise” Really Means
This policy effectively places more than 8 million Palestinians under Israeli rule without equal rights. International observers and legal scholars increasingly label this as a form of apartheid, citing the systemic denial of civil liberties and national sovereignty to Palestinians.
The United States and Unwavering Support
Despite mounting international criticism, the United States continues to provide unconditional support to Israel. When Biden was President he issued several warnings and red lines, yet the Israeli government has proceeded undeterred, confident in continued American backing.
Read: Ellen Ochoa: The Inspiring Story of the First Latina Astronaut
The U.S. Public’s Misunderstanding
Sachs warns that the average American is unaware of the extent to which U.S. foreign policy is shaped by Israeli interests. He points out that for the past two decades, U.S. military interventions in the Middle East have often aligned with Israeli objectives.
International Isolation of Israel
Recently, a vote at the United Nations saw only four countries — the United States, Israel, Argentina, and Paraguay — opposing a resolution affirming Palestinians’ right to self-determination. The overwhelming majority of the world now sides with Palestine on fundamental human rights issues.
A Global Consensus for Palestinian Rights
This shift reflects growing international recognition of the long-standing injustices faced by Palestinians. Nations across Europe, Africa, Asia, and Latin America increasingly support calls for an independent Palestinian state.
Historical Roots of the Conflict
The origins of this conflict trace back to 1917 with the Balfour Declaration, in which Britain promised a Jewish homeland in Palestine without consulting the Arab population living there. This marked the beginning of a century of broken promises and violent upheaval.
How History Was Twisted
By 1947, Palestinians comprised two-thirds of the population, yet the UN partition plan allocated 56% of the land to the Jewish minority. This inequity triggered war, mass displacement, and the creation of a permanent refugee population, particularly in Gaza.
The Ongoing Occupation
Following the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel occupied the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and Gaza. UN Security Council Resolution 242 labeled these as occupied territories and called for Israeli withdrawal — a demand that has yet to be fulfilled.
Why the Two-State Solution Keeps Failing
Despite decades of international advocacy for a two-state solution, Israel continues to expand settlements and reject any return to pre-1967 borders. U.S. vetoes at the UN have blocked meaningful progress time and again.
Why This Is Called Apartheid
Legal experts and international organizations, including the International Court of Justice, have increasingly referred to Israel’s rule over Palestinians as apartheid. The ICJ recently ruled that Israel must withdraw from occupied territories, a decision supported by the UN General Assembly.
The Netanyahu Doctrine
Sachs outlines what he calls the “Netanyahu Doctrine”: a strategy of refusing compromise, destabilizing opposing regimes, and using U.S. military power to achieve Israeli goals.
A Pattern of U.S.-Led Regime Change
This doctrine has contributed to American involvement in Iraq, Syria, Libya, and potential conflict with Iran. Sachs argues that these actions serve Israeli interests more than American security and have led to widespread instability.
The Real Solution
According to Sachs, the path to peace lies in recognizing Palestinian statehood. Negotiations are futile when one side refuses to give anything up. Only international pressure can change the current trajectory.
Why Negotiation Is Dead
Israel has no incentive to negotiate when it already controls the land and has U.S. protection. The only viable option left is global recognition of Palestine as a sovereign state.
The Role of AIPAC and Lobbying in U.S. Politics
Sachs highlights the influence of lobbying groups like APAC, (American Israel Public Affairs Committee) which spend millions to ensure unwavering U.S. support for Israel. In return, Israel receives billions in aid and political backing.
Why U.S. Policy Is for Sale
The return on investment for lobbying efforts is staggering. For a few hundred million dollars, AIPAC secures trillions in aid and war-related spending. Sachs criticizes Congress for effectively selling U.S. foreign policy at a bargain price.
Voices That Go Ignored
Former President Jimmy Carter has also spoken out against Israeli policies, comparing them to apartheid and urging respect for Palestinian rights. Yet such voices are rarely amplified in mainstream American discourse.
The Risk to Israel’s Own Survival
Sachs concludes that Israel’s current strategy is not only immoral but dangerous. The longer it isolates itself, the more vulnerable it becomes. A potential ruling of genocide by the ICJ would be a global turning point.
Final Thoughts
This conflict is not about Israel’s right to exist — that right is already recognized. It’s about whether Palestinians will ever be allowed to live in freedom and dignity. The longer the U.S. and Israel block that path, the further we drift from peace.
Read: How Elite U.S. Soldiers Are Strengthening Drug Cartels
FAQs
Q1: Why is Israel being labeled an apartheid state?
Because it governs millions of Palestinians without giving them equal rights, resembling systems of racial segregation.
Q2: What is Jeffrey Sachs proposing?
Immediate international recognition of a Palestinian state and U.S. policy shifts to support that goal.
Q3: Why hasn’t the two-state solution worked?
Israel refuses to compromise or negotiate in good faith, and the U.S. often blocks international efforts.
Q4: How does lobbying impact U.S. support for Israel?
Groups like AIPAC use significant financial influence to shape foreign policy in Israel’s favor.
